Internal Transfer of Airforce

Bobliosenior: Former Supreme Warlord=Warlord

Note: The “Second-In-Command” Rank has Now been ABOLISHED!

New Situation at R.P.F.

Dear Airforce Members,

of course; you already know this information. I will just add onto it with my personal opinion:

What the hell do we want to do with 9 Leaders? We have come back to a situation where people fight to the death to become Leader; but in the end, those 9 people will never be individual leader; too bad for them! My suggestion is loud and clearly stated: 2 LEADERS ARE PERFECT! Why? It is easier than having 9 people fighting for control and authority. Besides, if we need a 10-second decision, we can’t have Congress voting for the answer! 2 leaders are better than 1, because one leader could seize unfair power. However, if the other Leader notices that, he could report the other leader for that and that leader would be kicked out for abuse of power. But this isn’t as easy as saying: “Gregorey and one Head Warlord!” No! We need elections for this. And as Kyle posted:

“I know people think that is retarded, but this is a game where penguins have wars using snowballs. Does that NOT sound retarded? Look, if you are going to have a game-based army, you should have a leader who treats this like a game. Because it’s not fun to even play when the leader is so serious and self absorbed.”

Very true! In that case we CANNOT be an “army”! Every army needs discipline and a serious attitude towards things. Fun is something casual where the priority is having fun. So we aren’t the rebels we were before. If you want to rebel, you need to rebel against something with a serious attitude. Not with democratic talks. Either way: We are neither the Rebels nor the Army. We are a “Club”! And that’s NOT why I joined and spent 13 months here, trying to improve this place!

Up most sincerely,

Ziehen